Talk : Towards Science 2.0 : Science is (already!) socially networking :

Peer reviewing


The invisible hand of peer review

STEVAN HARNAD

5 Nov 1998

http://www.nature.com/nature/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html

Reactions to Esposito "Nautulus

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/329-guid.html

editorial review > peer review

"Peer review is neither necessary nor sufficient for scientific progress."

BMJ 2007;335:451 (1 September)

Peer usage versus peer review

Bruce G Charlton, editor in chief, Medical Hypotheses

http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/

2006

"open" peer review

Wiki's: Wisdom of crowds


Previous: Social groups Up:Science is (already!) socially networking


Created by rik@cogsci.ucsd.edu 4/11/08