Talk : Towards Science 2.0 : Science is (already!) socially networking : |
The invisible hand of peer review
STEVAN HARNAD
5 Nov 1998
http://www.nature.com/nature/webmatters/invisible/invisible.html
Reactions to Esposito "Nautulus
http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/329-guid.html
editorial review > peer review
"Peer review is neither necessary nor sufficient for scientific progress."
BMJ 2007;335:451 (1 September)
Peer usage versus peer review
Bruce G Charlton, editor in chief, Medical Hypotheses
http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/
2006
"open" peer review
Wiki's: Wisdom of crowds
Previous: Social groups Up:Science is (already!) socially networking
Created by rik@cogsci.ucsd.edu 4/11/08